Five years after the Paris Agreement: Large gap between promises and current implementation

Analysis of climate policy to implement the Paris Agreement

Researchers from institutes around the world collaborated in a unique multi-model study to assess the impact of current climate policies. The results of the study were published this week in Nature Communications and focus on emission trends in seven countries and regions jointly responsible for the majority of global greenhouse gas emissions. The aim of the Paris Agreement is to keep global temperature rise this century to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 °C. This goal has been formulated at the global level, but achieving it critically depends on the national implementation of climate policies. To this end, countries have pledged national contributions (nationally determined contributions (NDCs)) and implemented domestic policies to achieve them. Before the postponed UN climate conference (COP26) next year, countries are expected to update their pledged national contributions (NDCs). Therefore, insights into the impact of current national policy is essential. To this end, the impact of this domestic policy, over the period up to 2030, has been analysed using nine climate policy models from various institutes around the world.

The impact of currently implemented policies

The scenario analysis performed by the models used in the study shows that in order to meet the global target of the climate agreement in a cost-optimal way, a 40%–50% reduction in global emissions is required. In order to assess the impact of implemented policies, the researchers inventoried the most important policies implemented in G20 countries and regions, from which they analysed seven large countries and regions in more detail. They found that the impact of the G20 policies would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2.5 to 5.0 Gt CO₂ eq by 2030 (median 3.5 Gt CO₂ eq) or 5.5% (4%–8%), compared to a situation where no climate policies and targets would have been implemented. The actual reductions fall significantly short of those pledged in the NDCs. If implemented, those policies would lead to an additional reduction of about 5 to 10 Gt CO₂ eq (median of the models is 7.7 GtCO₂ eq), equalling an emission reduction of about 17% (15%–22%) by 2030, compared against a scenario without emission reductions. So, although the study shows that policies are indeed being implemented, it also identifies a large gap between the Paris goal and countries' pledged contribution, and an even larger gap with the actual implemented policies. A delay in action would either lead to additional costs or failure to achieve the Paris goal. The gap by 2030 is estimated to be around 22–28 GtCO₂ eq.

Trends in 7 large countries and regions

The study focuses on Brazil, China, the European Union, India, Japan, the Russian Federation and the United States. It identifies a large gap between the impact of implemented climate policies and the reductions consistent with the overall goal of the Paris Agreement in all countries. The underlying cause (an ambition or implementation gap) varies between countries. In order to achieve the targets, all countries should accelerate the implementation of policies regarding renewable technologies and energy efficiency improvements.

Results and policy database publicly available

The overview of the most important policies in the various countries forms part of the so-called climate policy database developed as part of the study. Researchers can still contribute to this database by adding new information on current policies. The main results from the study are presented via The Global Stocktake tool.